Layoff Alternatives
Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008Knowledge@Wharton posted a comprehensive piece on layoff alternatives. The author discussed the impact of layoffs and the driving forces behind them. While larger companies often bow to the pressure of stakeholders, smaller firms have more flexibility and can do more shifting, saving money and talent.
Despite the opinion of one Wharton professor cited in the piece–”If you have a choice between a 10% wage cut and laying off 10% of the work force, why on earth would you choose the latter?”—the author recognizes there are no easy decisions when cost cutting is required:
“In the end, companies need to balance what’s best for their employees while making sure the company remains viable in tough times.”
Here’s how some companies featured in the story are (or have in the past) making ends meet:
- City of Atlanta, 2008 – 10% cut in hours for city employees
- People Link, 2008 – employees decided to voluntarily cut hours
- Megavolt, 2008 – temporarily move employees to other business units; 10 hour reduction/week
- Cisco Systems, 2001 — allowed employees to take sabbaticals at 1/3 their salary.
- Voluntary pay cuts in exchange for deferred compensation (vacation, stock)
- Voluntary layoffs
- Voluntary retirements
And here’s a snapshot of the costs of a layoff:
- Morale issues for all staff
- Unemployment insurance premiums
- Severance packages
- Outplacement services
- Risk of litigation
- Hiring / training costs to ramp back up
More on staffing issues in a tough economy at the Life Meets Work main site.
Posted by Jaime