Archive for the ‘Career Development’ Category

School-to-Entrepeneur

Wednesday, July 7th, 2010

 

 More on the “recession leads to entrepreneurism” story we started in June….

The trend is highest among older workers, but it’s not just retirees taking a do-it-yourself attitude to job creation.  BLS data also shows job creation jumped by 16 percent among ages 20-24. 

You might say it was a tough economy that led then-24-year-old Suzan Odabasi to start her own business in February.  After months of frustration in an unfulfilling, low-paid job, Odabasi took a chance and launched Yeni Media, a social media consulting business. 

“The job market was very tough during the spring of 2009, when I was looking for jobs,” Odabasi said. “I realized it would be tough to find a position that would fulfill me. After six months in a job which didn’t challenge me…I realized that I need more independence and the ability to make my own schedule and set my own standards.

“The bad economy helped me realize this—if I had landed a better job right away I might have stayed satisfied with the status quo much longer.”

Ain’t That a Kick

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

Photo Credit: Hank Ashby

It seems that America’s would-be entrepreneurs needed a swift kick in the pants.  And they got it by way of a pink slip.

The recession did wonders to boost the number of entrepreneurs in the U.S. That’s according to the Kauffman Index of Entrepreneurial Activity.

“Rather than making history for its deep recession and record unemployment, 2009 might instead be remembered as the year business startups reached their highest level in 14 years,” the foundation reported, “—even exceeding the number of startups during the peak 1999-2000 technology boom.”

The motivating factor, says Kauffman analysts—layoffs. “Challenging economic times can serve as a motivational boost to individuals who have been laid-off to become their own employers and future job creators,” said Carl Schramm, president and CEO of the Kauffman Foundation.

But not so for Joseph Petree who quit his job in November 2008.  Petree was the design director for RS Owens, an awards company that supplied the Oscars, MTV Awards, NASCAR and any number of other premier events.  He left to build his own brand, designing furniture, home décor and still—awards.

People told him he was crazy every day for quitting during a recession, says Petree.  But despite the economy, he has enough work to keep him busy fulltime.

Who knows, Petree could be the next Michael Graves. A 2009 report, also from the Kauffman Foundation, found that more than half the companies on the 2009 Fortune 500 list were launched during a recession or bear market, along with nearly half the firms on the 2009 Inc. Magazine list of America’s fastest-growing companies.

It’s Personal

Monday, May 3rd, 2010


We’re in the midst of refinancing our home and as you might expect, the bank had no shortage of questions for us.  This was the last of the special requests to trickle in: Please explain why Jaime’s income went down in 2009.

Really??  If the global economic recession wasn’t enough evidence, you’d think my profession would have tipped them off: self-employed, freelance writer.

But I dutifully provided a signed rationale, as requested.  I pointed out (again) that I was self-employed and that my workload commonly fluctuated with the economy (obviously).  And, I wrote, several longstanding clients were behind on their payments.

Roughly $7,000 behind.

Clearly I am not alone.  The Wall Street Journal reports that freelancers had more than a little trouble collecting last year.  Independent contractors don’t have the legal protection employees do when it comes to requiring payment for services rendered.

At the same time, a local Chicago news report called out one of the area’s companies as among the ‘worst’ for not paying its freelancers. The amount writers had reported past due: $9000. 

Puh-lease.  If a business past due $9000 is being held up as the ‘worst’ then surely our economy is in far, far better shape that I thought.

The REAL problem I see is that the firm is accused of securing new writers while it wasn’t paying its old ones.  That’s deceitful.  If you’re behind on payments and your freelancers aren’t willing to keep working while you float, then you need to alter your business.

One of my own past due clients is taking a project in house this month.  The process will be painful for them, I’m sure.  The quality, I’m afraid, will inevitably decline.  I would have written it, and they know it.  But they’re doing this for my sake, as well as their own.

Ideally, you’ve built strong enough relationships with your independent team that they’re willing to stand by you during a downturn.  Ideally, you have the kind of relationships where you can be frank about your economic situation and your prospects for the future. 

All across the country, employees are volunteering to take pay cuts and working days without pay.  Why? Out of loyalty.  Out of a desire to help their employer succeed.  Out of a real need to preserve their jobs.

I don’t see letting a few of my loyal clients skate by this past year any differently.  They’ve always been extraordinarily supportive of me, shared my name with colleagues, and provided valuable exposure.  Why would I turn my back on them now?

It’s not just business.  It’s personal.  It is.

I’m willing to bet there are thousands of businesses floating by on similar seas of goodwill—and perhaps that, more than anything else, is what’s keeping our economy alive.

More Helicopter Parents

Friday, March 5th, 2010

More comments on our helicopter parents story:

Your article reminded me of an experience I had recently with a helicopter parent.  This mom and her son stopped in our office (I work at a placement/staffing agency) for him to fill out an application.  She was a little controlling, but I didn’t think much about it at first.

Then I asked him to come in to my office so we could talk a little more about what kind of position he was looking for and how we could help him.  Not only did his mother follow us and pull up a chair, she answered EVERY question I asked, even when I would say “I’d like to hear from him.”

Needless to say, I cut that conversation short.  I feel bad for the kid, but I couldn’t place him at one of our clients.  The Freud in me was afraid he’d snap or something. – Peggy

What’s your horror story?

Take Back the Night?

Friday, January 15th, 2010

Remember when you thought it was a badge of honor to pull an all nighter? Man, I stayed up all night and rocked that paper out!

Some office cultures are trending that way. Well maybe not all nighters, exactly, but logging in at night has become the way you prove yourself. They way you show your dedication. The way you say, ‘I’m a superstar and I’ll do whatever it takes to help this company succeed.’

Technology has added an second layer of work during the evening hours—a layer that’s becoming expected.

The advantages of occasional evening hours cannot be denied. It offers uninterrupted time to crank out a project. And it gives people the opportunity to leave work at a reasonable hour and take care of kids (or just de-stress) before returning to a high-priority issue.

But the problems are also obvious—largest among them staff burnout and family stress.

People need one-on-one time with their spouse, and you can’t get that when you’re logging in as soon as the kids go to bed.

Plus, our brains require mental rest. Just because you’re not actively working through a problem doesn’t mean your brain isn’t firing away it. Putting space between you and your responsibilities often leads to better focus and clarity.

Is evening work expected at your office?

Are you able to turn off your work brain? Do you even want to?

So the Jack Welch Thing

Wednesday, July 15th, 2009

Jack Welch at the Society for Human Resource Management’s annual conference, as reported by The Juggle at The Wall Street Journal

“There’s no such thing as work-life balance…There are work-life choices, and you make them, and they have consequences.”  Mr. Welch, a thrice married father of four, said those who take time off for family could be passed over for promotions “if you’re not there in the clutch.”

Andrew Leonard at Salon
MomsRising
The Mama Bee

Plenty well said.

Posted by Jaime

Semantics Matter

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

A new book suggests women can have it all, simply by deciding they have enough.  That’s the thesis behind the recently released “Womenomics: Write Your Own Rules for Success,” by Claire Shipman, senior national correspondent for ABC News’ “Good Morning America” and Katty Kay, Washington correspondent and anchor for “BBC World News America.”

The book includes specific strategies to negotiate a flexible work schedule and examples of what happens when companies get past face-time-management and start focusing on results.

The title, however, is unfortunate.  ‘Womenomics’ suggests that these career / life issues are merely women’s issues, read: mothers’ issues.  This an inaccurate representation, shifting a disproportionate responsibility onto women’s shoulders.

Career / life balance is a personal issue that affects men just as much as women.  Moreover, it’s not just a family issue anymore.  This is not just about moms or dads, but also young professionals and creative thinkers who know that productivity is not confined to artificially lit, sterile offices.

This is an issue for anyone who knows that results don’t require regimented 8 hour work days, and that 60-hour work weeks can likewise be detrimental to long-term performance.

This is an issue for everyone who knows that driving 30 minutes to sit in an office and talk on the phone to someone else who drove 30 minutes to sit in an office and talk on the phone is just plain wasteful.

This is an issue for everyone who sits at a desk at 3:30 thinking, ‘I’m beat, but I can’t leave yet. What kind of busy work can I do until 5:00?”

Shipman and Kay admit it’s not just a women’s issue, but clearly they’re approaching the issue from a feminine perspective. (They make gender generalizations like “women tend to be self-deprecating” and “women tend to be perfectionists.”)  Yes, they’re honest and real and relevant to a lot of people.  But perhaps they miss the bigger picture.

Titles like these diminish the issue, assign blame, and give people an excuse to shut it out.  Titles like these are inaccurate and unnecessary.  Titles like these are no way to open minds and lead change.

Posted by Jaime

Note to MBAs: Up or Out

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

There’s a cost to taking time off of work.

First the obvious. You don’t get paid when you don’t work. (That’s the general rule, anyway.)

Next, there’s the impact on your social security benefits or pension.

Often, there’s the loss of an incremental salary bump, compounded over future years.

And for too many, there’s an irrevocable impact on a career—an up-or-out philosophy that suggests anyone who isn’t consistently moving forward isn’t destined for the top.

Now two well respected Harvard researchers have quantified the impact of a career hiatus. Surveying Harvard College alumni, Claudia Goldin and Lawrence Katz calculated the financial penalty for someone who takes a 18 months off of work and found…it depends on what you do.

Earnings loss, per degree:

  • Medical doctors – 16%
  • BA’s – 25%
  • Ph.D’s – 29%
  • Lawyers – 29%
  • MBAs – 41%

Clearly something is going on with those MBA’s.  As the New York Times suggests, the size of financial loss “suggests that time off puts them on a completely different career track.”

Not long ago, well-educated Harvard women were criticized for taking time away from work—“wasting” brains and education that were needed in the marketplace. Yet the study suggests that these women (or men, for that matter) aren’t valued in the workplace. How could they be, when they are so permanently and drastically punished merely for stepping back a bit?

Can we surmise that to be an MBA (characterized as accountants and financial types in the NYT) is simply incompatible with family?

White House Pushes for Green Jobs

Monday, March 2nd, 2009

Members of a newly formed White House Task Force on Middle Class Working Families held their first meeting on February 27.

The task force, chaired by Vice President Joel Biden, is charged with no small task—that of improving quality of life for America’s middle class. Specifically that goal includes the following:

•    Expanding education and lifelong training opportunities
•    Improving work and family balance
•    Restoring labor standards, including workplace safety
•    Helping to protect middle-class and working-family incomes
•    Protecting retirement security

In its first session, the task force focused on “green jobs” as a pathway to a stronger middle class. A White House blog for the task force suggests that these green jobs will be created by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

In the abstract, green jobs are positions that “provide products and services that use renewable energy resources, reduce pollution, and conserve energy and natural resources.” Specific examples include energy auditors, weatherization experts, green builders, all sorts of electrical and solar and fuel engineers, as well as admin and sales staff to support green product manufactures.

Reportedly, green jobs pay 10 to 20 percent more than other like-positions.

For more on the White House task force, including the “green jobs” meeting, visit www.AStrongMiddleClass.gov.

Posted by Jaime

Obama Signs Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

Thursday, January 29th, 2009

President Obama signed his first bill today—the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.

Ledbetter worked as a supervisor at Goodyear Tire and Rubber for nearly two decades.  In 1998, someone left an anonymous note in her mailbox, alerting her to a wage disparity.

As reported on NPR, all 16 men who did her job earned more, including a relative newcomer who earned $6000 more than the well-tenured Lettbetter.

She filed a EEOC complaint and won the maximum allowable damages of $360,000.  Goodyear appealed and the Supreme Court overturned the award, interpreting the law to indicate that discrimination complaints must be filed within 180 days of the initial discrimination decision.

Congress made a failed attempt to adjust the law in 2007.  Opposition suggests the revision will encourage unfounded lawsuits.  As NPR reporter Nina Totenberg said, Ledbetter was upset by such criticism and noted the law still “caps damages at $300,000, limits back pay to two years, and does nothing to fix the effects of unequal pay on pensions and social security.”

For more: Video and transcript of the signing ceremony and President Obama’s comments today.

Posted by Jaime