Archive for the ‘Fostering Flexibility’ Category

States Go Off Road

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

When it comes to teleworking programs, we make much of the benefits to employers–things like business continuity, productivity, and retention.

But for cities, promoting telework has a whole other purpose–limiting traffic congestion and emissions. 

Indeed many states have enacted some sort of telework legislation, either creating policies to encourage telework among state employees or by providing incentives in the private sector.

Minnesota, Connecticut, and Virginia all have strong telework programs aimed at reducing traffic congestion and emissions.  These programs target congested metro areas, providing grants to help companies get telework programs off the ground.

Virginia: TeleworkVA, for example, provides up to $35,000 to companies to offset the cost of telecommuting-related equipment, training and consulting services. First established in 2001, it has more than 120 participating employers with an estimated 10.8 million vehicle miles reduced annually.

Connecticut: Telecommute Connecticut! is a statewide commuter service program of CDOT providing free assistance to employers for the design and implementation of telecommuting programs.

Minnesota: The eWorkPlace program provides support to businesses transitioning to telecommuting programs by providing free consulting and more.

Other Programs

  • Georgia: Income tax credit up to $20,000 for planning, consulting or training; tax credit up to $1,200 per employee if they implement telework programs
  • Maryland: Offers free professional telework consulting services to Baltimore employers.
  • Oregon: Helps cities incentives to assist with purchasing equipment to telework, and provides ongoing resources to assist employers develop custom-fit telework programs
  • Texas: The Houston program emphasizes both flextime & telecommuting to alleviate congestion during peak travel periods.  Initial stages involve best practice sharing among area businesses.
  • Utah’s TravelWise initiative includes alternative work schedules and telework

What other *telework=traffic reduction* programs are you aware of?

Who Moved My Water Cooler?

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

More reaction from yesterday’s webinar…the problem of the missing water cooler. 

For the employer–How can you replace that shared learning that takes place in the workplace when employees swap stories?

For the flex worker–How can you replace the exposure you used to get from bumping into a senior partner in the hallway?

Those are big, big questions with no fast, and no catch-all answers. These same questions are closely linked to the idea of how we build a sense of team with remote workers. 

 The person at home is missing out on happy hour, birthday cake, baby showers, and that immediate office elation when you land a big account.

Maybe they’re happy to miss out.  (Thank goodness I don’t have to go sing happy birthday anymore!)  But still…camaraderie is important.

One suggestion – assign office buddies.  Don’t cringe.  It’s not as grade school as it sounds.  It’s a person who works in the office, communicating with someone who doesn’t.  The in-house buddy picks up the phone when the company wins a big account and generally acts as the eyes and ears for the person at home. 

Examples…
Remote Worker:  Is Bob really in today? His IM is on, but I can’t reach him.
Remote Worker: Hey, I’m coming into the office next week.  What’s the road construction situation there?

What else can you do? Depends on what fits your corporate culture, how many remote team members you have, and how geographically dispersed they are.  Maybe virtual happy hours, daily group phone chats, group IM, internal/private Twitter-esque applications. 

Maybe it means bringing your virtual team members into the home office once a quarter.  Or maybe it means videoconferencing.  Think about how you build team now and how that could be extended to your remote team.

For more…sign up for our webinar series.  We’re tackling this in Session 1!

Universal Truths

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

So I have this friend that sends a lot of those email forwards.  You know, the kind with the ‘I read it on Snopes’ warnings, the all time greatest answering machine messages, recipe exchanges, and the inspiring / sucker punch change-up emails that get you all emotional before threatening lifetime disappointment if you don’t forward it immediately to 20 friends.

Mostly I hit delete.  But today I took a glance at the list of 28 Universal Truths. Here’s #11:

You never know when it will strike, but there comes a moment at work when you know that you just aren’t going to do anything productive for the rest of the day.

Ah yes, the ‘my mind is fuzzy and my energy is sapped and maybe I can just clean out my files for a while and be sorta kinda useful without actually using my brain until it’s finally 5:00′ feeling.

That feeling sucks!  

And if you’re having that feeling it means you’re at a workplace that is measuring your value by the number of hours you spend in your chair, not how much you get done.  Or maybe they figure employees will abuse the hell out of any flexibility program and requiring you to stay at your desk until 5:00 is just their way of maintaining order.  We must keep order.

That’s too bad, because for consultants and flex workers #11 goes more like this:

You never know when it will strike, but there comes a moment when you know that you just aren’t going to do anything productive for the rest of the day, and so you log off your computer and do something else–something necessary or something fun–so you can come back to it tomorrow with fresh energy and a clear head.

That #11 feeling was probably my least favorite thing about my office job.  When the 3:30 doldrums hit there was nothing to do to clear my head but walk all of 40 feet to the break room and rummage around for a snack.  Now, when my brain shuts off, I stop trying to work.  I put in a load of laundry or I take the dog for a walk.  My family is better for it.  I’m better for it.  And my work is definitely better for it. 

Yeah, #11 is a truth I remember, but no longer have to dread.  Now #22 on the other hand, that’s a whole other story…

I have a hard time deciphering the fine line between boredom and hunger.

Yup, still dealing with that one.

 

POD People

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

Homeworking is finally a viable business market.  At least one British company thinks so. 

Introducing the OfficePOD, a relocatable, stand-alone office designed for home workers.

The OfficePOD is roughly 2.1m x 2.1m (that’s roughly 6.5 foot square for us colonists) and is designed to sit in the homeworkers backyard.

The garden-based POD, the company says, ‘provides a work environment that is separate from the disruptions of home life.’ Marketed to corporations and consumers alike, the POD is the solution to home-work distractions.  And for would-be teleworkers who have no appropriate space inside their house, the POD is a ready-to-work solution that keeps the worker at home, if not inside the house proper.

With two glass walls, the POD provides the relative impression of working outside.  Sounds great in the spring and fall, but we wonder at the weather-tightness of this portable, glass-wall capsule.  It might be wonderful to work cheek to jowl with backyard snowbanks, but then again it might be rather cold. (Product literature says the PODs include heating, cooling and ventilation.) On the plus side, having to transition from POD to home to use the bathroom might help a few workers cut back their coffee habits come winter.

Power is cabled from the home or garage and Internet connection can be similarly cabled, or run wirelessly. 

Offered for lease or sale (nearly £15K not including installation), the company provides delivery and complete setup.  Among the benefits marketed to companies—increased productivity, staff attraction and retention, reduced CO2 emissions, and a flexible business environment.

In this video, company representative David Forbes says they first came up with the concept in 2001, but that homeworking was not ‘mainstream’ enough to warrant the product.

“The timing was too soon. Technology was an obstacle; it’s now an enabler.  Management culture hadn’t come around to accepting homework in the way it does now.”

What do you think? Would you like to work in this backyard getaway?  Can you picture it in your yard?

Today’s Conversations

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

The forum is streaming live, starting at 1:15 eastern.

The White House Forum on Workplace Flexibility being held today is a symbolic step toward recognition that American businesses to rethink the way we work.  As Ellen Galinsky stated so eloquently in her Huffington Post essay on Monday, “never in those early days could I have expected a President and a First Lady to talk openly about their own struggles in managing work and family.”

While the visibility given to workplace flexibility is critical, the long term impact on American business, public policy and our workers will be undermined if we’re not deliberate in our positioning.  Let’s be clear.  Workplace flexibility is not just an initiative to make it easier for Americans to balance work and life.  To position it as such is to suggest that it’s the responsibility of American businesses to cater to the needs of their workers.  Work/life positioned this way is a non-starter for most companies.

Workplace flexibility is important, not just for caregivers of children and aging parents, but for everyone.  It is a tool that enables employees to:  work when they’re most productive, take care of personal issues on their own time, improve their health, and unleash an entrepreneurial spirit within their workplaces. That’s what happens when employees are trusted and held responsible for their own performance.

And while the business case for workplace flexibility is compelling, it has simply not been enough to convince an overwhelming number of companies to implement these strategies.

In the days and weeks to come, in our living rooms and board rooms, let’s keep in mind that ultimately, the conversation today is about how to change the way we think about work, so that it benefits all parties and secures the prosperity of our nation for generations to come.

For more information on how to make workplace flexibility a mainstream reality in America, please read The Squishy Middle, A Life Meets Work Manifesto or contact us at 888-462-5691.

Who’s Going to the White House?

Monday, March 29th, 2010

Much buzz about the upcoming White House Forum on Workplace Flexibility scheduled for March 31st. Beyond this brief press statement, details are in short supply.

The invitation-only event will be attended by about 100 people, including some high profile workplace flexibility advocates, corporate leaders in workforce best practices, labor leaders and small business owners.

For folks entrenched in the work-life field much of that buzz involves who’s going and who isn’t.

Confirmed guests:

Rumored (but logical) guests:

  • Donna Klein, president and founder of Corporate Voices for Working Families
  • Cali Ressler and Jodi Thompson of CultureRx (i.e. ROWE)

Sadly, we didn’t get the call, but neither did several significantly noteworthy work life advocates. All in all, we’re looking forward to learning more about the discussion, and hoping the day provides a good cross-section of insights from all the work-lifers at the table.

Marry at Will

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

Rose, Rose, Rose, Rose
Will I ever see thee wed?
I will marry at thy will sire.
At thy will.

Think of an unmarried woman you know and love.  Maybe it’s a divorced sister with kids, a young teacher, or your widowed neighbor.  Many of these women are the sole breadwinner for their households. The sole person paying a mortgage, securing health insurance, saving for retirement.

Yet, they have the lowest economic power among men or women, married or not.

From a new report from the Center for American Progress on Advancing the Economic Security of Unmarried Women:

It’s difficult for women—and unmarried women in particular—to save and plan adequately for retirement due to a lifetime of disparities, including lower pay due to the gender wage gap, time out of the workforce while raising children or providing care giving to other relatives, and lack of access to a partner’s savings. Unmarried women also have lower access to employer-sponsored pensions or retirement plans because their own jobs do not offer them or because they do not have access to a spouse’s plan…

Now think about what kind of policies (economic and workplace) would help support this woman you love.  Perhaps it’s wage fairness legislation, subsidized childcare, access to health insurance, paid work leave and flexible schedules, a social security system that recognizes the value of caregiving.

It doesn’t have to be a matter of entitlement. Stop thinking about the stereotypical ‘welfare mom’ and focus on the unmarried women you know and respect.  Think about divorced moms who can’t work their way up the corporate ladder for lack of flexible childcare.  Think about the widowed grandmother in your neighborhood who stayed at home for many years to raise her children and earned less in social security.  Think about all the young 20-something secretarial assistants trying to pay rent (and transportation and dry cleaning) on $11 an hour.

The family structure is changing.  Our economic policies and workforce norms are based on an old idea of young, long marriages and lasting dual-income households.  We no longer have either, and we as a nation can afford neither nostalgia or Pollyanna-utopianism.  We must respond to change.

What would you lobby for if it affected someone you knew and loved?

Dear Uncle Sam: Keep Your Medals

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

Two California legislators have introduced a bill that would establish a federal Work Life Balance Award.  If approved, the award would be administered by the Department of Labor and would recognize employers with exemplary work life policies.   The Workforce Protections Subcommittee will be discussing the issue tomorrow.

While it’s great that the subcommittee will be thinking about work life issues, we don’t need another award! This niche is already well filled by the Alfred P. Sloan Awards for Business Excellence in Workplace Flexibility.  They have prestige and name recognition and most of all–they already have an excellent, nationwide award system in place.  Such an effort by the federal government would be unnecessary duplication of effort.

Better that the Workforce Protections committee focus on legislation that moves the issue further along.  Allow us to suggest changes in the tax law to support independent contractors, incentives for telecommuting, and paid sick leave.

Beyond The Business Case

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

So, how do we address our collective malaise when it comes to workplace flexibility? How do we firm up the squishy middle? We need to move beyond the research, beyond business case—promises of greater profits are clearly not enough.

1. Stop paying lip service to the availability of flexible work. Awards are no guarantee of a flex-friendly reality. Employee surveys as a part of the award process are a step in the right direction, but awards in general can be a band-aid for the greater challenges facing these organizations. And while, we’re at it, stop counting the opportunity for occasional flex in the case of a snow-storm, or sick child as equivalent to a flex-friendly culture.

2. Government must play a role in creating incentives for businesses to move in this direction, and in changing labor laws and tax code to accommodate the new, independent worker. This will accelerate the rate of adoption of structural supports that benefit both companies and their employees.

In our 2008 study, Work/Life issues in America, over 62% of employers indicated they’d like to see government move in this direction.

3. Within our corporations, middle managers need incentives to support flex policies. Build them into their compensation plans.

4. Initiate corporate training programs so middle managers can express, work through and develop solutions for overcoming their resistance.

5. Establish informal networks of work/life leads throughout every organization, by location or business practice, to actively communicate the company’s vision for work/life as part of its living, breathing culture.

6. CEO’s must do more than just subscribe to work/life as a vision, but must communicate the strategic necessity to their direct reports and hold them accountable to quarterly goals and again, tie compensation to the achievement of these goals.

7. Management must set the tone and model positive work/life practices. Think meet-less workdays, email-free vacations, and setting realistic deadlines to avoid heroics that become part of the culture “just because that’s how we’ve always done it.”

8. Educate managers about why flex CAN BE available for every employee by expanding their definition of flex to include best practices for hourly workers as highlighted in the recent Corporate Voices for Working Families study and implementation guides.

9. Tie flex to HR, talent development and diversity initiatives. Help HR managers get comfortable with flex as a cultural, strategic initiative that helps them accomplish their talent development and inclusion goals, not just as a tactical alternative to employee recognition programs.

10. Stress performance as the primary responsibility of every employee and a condition for employment, and build both IT and performance management systems to monitor and communicate performance. When performance is the driving factor for success, management can build a culture based on trust—a culture where rules don’t restrict innovation or engagement and where flexible work cultures can thrive.

Why is this so critical?
Consider the most recent Catalyst report Catalyst report Pipeline’s Broken Promise. Researchers found that the pipeline of professional women poised to fill the ranks of corporate boards and executive management (the pipeline corporate America thought it was developing these last 15 years) is woefully lacking.

Add to it that, for the first time, American men are now experiencing more work/life stress than women.

In order to build a pipeline of professional men and women from all races and socioeconomic backgrounds, we need to build structural supports that both acknowledge the needs of our businesses and the needs of our workers. The prosperity of our nation depends on it.

The Squishy Middle

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

Part I

Over the last few weeks, I’ve been busy. Really busy…networking, speaking and listening to people on all sides of the work/life issue: top female executives; middle managers; women in construction, technology, manufacturing; advocates for women and girls; executive directors of social service agencies; vice-presidents of diversity and HR, heads of media organizations; and government administrators.
And I’m convinced now, more than ever, of the real workforce challenge facing our nation.

We need to move beyond lip-service, work/life awards, and the business case for flex and get to the real work of making it a reality in business today. The solution lies in addressing the lack of support by middle managers.

We need to firm up the squishy middle. Middle management attitudes are preventing flexible work from becoming a reality for most Americans.

Listen to employees and top executives of a number of the Working Mother Top 100 companies, as I have, and they’ll tell you that often the policy exists on paper and flex is available to some. But, the opportunity for flexible work and work/life balance in the day-to-day lives of their employees is no different than for employees of non-flex friendly companies.

Listen to human resource managers of “best workplace” companies and they’ll tell you that they lack the know-how to get flex policies to be a living, breathing part of their company’s culture. They face resistance from executives and middle managers, as well as from employees who are too afraid to ask for the flex they need.

Talk with companies who boast flexible work policies but don’t want their employees to know about, or take advantage of, them. They believe policy is good enough and fear the repercussions if all of their employees requested flexible work.

Look at the resources we devote to training under-privileged, low income individuals to get job training and join the workforce. Now look at how many of them remain low-wage earners throughout their careers. They do not have access to the professional development, mentoring and structural supports (think after-school care, transportation) to enable them to compete. Joining the job ranks isn’t enough.

People ask me all the time, what is it going to take to get this to change. I believe the answer lies in both external, labor market realities and an internal shift in management attitudes. It’s not a matter of building the business case to show companies the profitability, productivity and efficiency gains they’ll achieve by adopting these practices. It will require a shift in the mindset of management, especially middle management, to see their employees as an integral part of their company’s success– as much as their capital investments, product innovation, or stock price.

This enlightenment will either evolve willingly as it has in some companies (see our Patagonia blog post) or it will come because of the fundamental economic and labor shift taking place in our country today.

The future of the workforce is in independent contractors who will work for themselves, moving fluidly from job to job. Companies will hire the services they need, when they need them.

Gone will be the paternalist control of employees in exchange for health benefits and advancement opportunities. The levers management currently uses to motivate workers will be removed and replaced by the exchange of money for services rendered and results achieved.

This future is evolving now—as our country shifts from a manufacturing to knowledge/service based culture—as the sheer number of skilled workers diminishes. Do you question this logic? Ask a recruiter in your company about open job orders. Even in this recession, good talent is hard to find.

- Kyra Cavanaugh
President, Life Meets Work
March 17, 2009

Next….10 steps to firm up the squish middle: LMW Manifesto Part II.